On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:42:12 EDT, Thomas Tuttle said: > Frankly, I think Intel is misinterpreting how strict the FCC is being > (or maybe the FCC is being too strict). The FCC has in the past managed to come up with the most astoundingly brain-dead regulations (for instance, "fixing" the lack of any actual encryption on some cell and portable phone by banning scanners...) > Frankly, I'm annoyed that, if Intel understood the full extent of the > problem, that they didn't take a better approach and simply give the > card a set of legal values. It doesn't need to understand the > subtleties of what they mean. It just needs to know frequencies 1, 2, > and 3 are okay, but not 4, 5, and 6, and that the max power is xx dBm. The problem is that in the US, 1,2, and 3 are OK, in Sweden 1,4,6 are OK, in Germany it's 2,3, and 7, and China insists on 1.5,2.5, and 3.5....
Attachment:
pgpGjfI8UtIF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: "Joseph Michael Smidt" <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Thorsten Kranzkowski <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Thomas Tuttle <[email protected]>
- Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Prev by Date: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Next by Date: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Previous by thread: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Next by thread: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Index(es):
 |