On July 11 at 16:16 EDT, Thorsten Kranzkowski hastily scribbled: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:25:45PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > Also there is no good reason why supplying this daemon as closed source... > > All they > > wish is people don't mess with their frequencies, and sooner or later > > someone will... > > Using interesting frequencies or output power would be fun for > radio amateurs (like me). 2.4GHz is one of our playgrounds after all :-) Hear, hear! > Just because Joe Average isn't allowed to use such features doesn't > mean that there aren't any legitimate users for it. > > Preventing the accidental use of unauthorized features would be enough, > I think (warnings that force you to look up the manual to find out the > correct --force option or similar) > I expect developers to be sensible enough to only offer 'public legal' > values in the default options list. Frankly, I think Intel is misinterpreting how strict the FCC is being (or maybe the FCC is being too strict). I would interpret their mandates as meaning that, as purchased, equipment can't transmit on unauthorized frequencies, and that it's not "user-modifiable". User modification doesn't include things like opening the case of a toy walkie-talkie up and swapping out a crystal, nor does it include things like opening up the firmware or driver for something and messing with it. Frankly, I'm annoyed that, if Intel understood the full extent of the problem, that they didn't take a better approach and simply give the card a set of legal values. It doesn't need to understand the subtleties of what they mean. It just needs to know frequencies 1, 2, and 3 are okay, but not 4, 5, and 6, and that the max power is xx dBm. OTOH, I'd love to get one of these cards and play with it. I'd love a WiFi card that can run up to 5 or 10 watts. (1500 is a little much, and my laptop's battery can't supply it :-) -- Thomas Tuttle
Attachment:
pgpRNHNTky6sB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- References:
- Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: "Joseph Michael Smidt" <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- From: Thorsten Kranzkowski <[email protected]>
- Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] APM resume breakage from 2.6.18-rc1 clocksource changes
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] Re: Magic Alt-SysRq change in 2.6.18-rc1
- Previous by thread: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Next by thread: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Index(es):