Hi. On Wednesday 12 July 2006 08:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 00:01, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 07:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday 11 July 2006 14:45, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > Was that 10% speedup on suspend or resume, or both? With LZF, I see > > > > approximately double the speed with both reading and writing: > > > > > > I was not referring to the speedup of writing and/or reading. > > > > > > The exercise was to measure the time needed to suspend the system and > > > get it back in a responsive state. I measured the time elapsed between > > > triggering the suspend and the moment at which I could switch between > > > some applications in X without any noticeable lag due to faulting in > > > some pages (that is a bit subjective, I must admit, but I was willing > > > to show that bigger images make substantial difference). > > > > > > I tested uswsusp with compression (LZF) and two image sizes: 120 MB and > > > (IIRC) about 220 MB on a 256 MB box. The result of the measurement for > > > the 120 MB image has always been greater than for the 220 MB image, but > > > the difference has never been greater than 10%. > > > > Ah ok. Are you sure you're getting that sort of throughput with LZF > > though - if you're not, you might be underestimating the advantage. > > Certainly I don't get that kind of speedup for writing. For reading I do. Hmm. I would have expected it to be the other way round, since I guess you need to do the reading synchronously - or do you read the image, then decompress it? (I'm reading and decompressing at the same time, using readahead to avoid waiting for pages all the time). I haven't had the chance to revisit uswsusp yet - I did sysfs support on Monday (took ages to figure it out!). Ah... so many things to do, and so little time to do them all! Regards, Nigel -- Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 5 Mitchell Street Cobden 3266 Victoria, Australia
Attachment:
pgpKIKCfExWBF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- References:
- Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- Prev by Date: Re: [openib-general] ipoib lockdep warning
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] ramdisk blocksize Kconfig entry
- Previous by thread: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- Next by thread: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
- Index(es):