Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 11:22 -0700, ysgrifennodd H. Peter Anvin:You know how much code there is in glibc to make your /bin/ls still work?A static linked pre libc 2.2 (thats libc not glibc) ls works fine today, as does a 0.98.5 era built rogue binary
Didn't work when I tried it, although that was a shared binary (and yes, I had the library there.) I assumed mostly that ZMAGIC support had bitrotted -- even back in '95 there was a lot of problems with ZMAGIC binaries when ext2 block size was > 1K.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: klibc and what's the next step?
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] 'volatile' in userspace
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc1-mm1 - bad serial port count messages
- Previous by thread: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- Next by thread: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- Index(es):
 |