Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 11:22 -0700, ysgrifennodd H. Peter Anvin:
You know how much code there is in glibc to make your /bin/ls still work?

A static linked pre libc 2.2 (thats libc not glibc) ls works fine today,
as does a 0.98.5 era built rogue binary

Didn't work when I tried it, although that was a shared binary (and yes, I had the library there.) I assumed mostly that ZMAGIC support had bitrotted -- even back in '95 there was a lot of problems with ZMAGIC binaries when ext2 block size was > 1K.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux