Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Olaf Hering wrote:
[]
> [...] in general old
> klibcs should continue to work (but may not compile against a newer
> kernel), but a newer klibc may not work on an older kernel.

Heh.  Olaf says about "basic backwards compatibilty", referring to
the klingon dictionary...

(please don't treat this as an offense - just.. funny)

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
  • Re: klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] irqtrace-option-off-compile-fix
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7] AVR32: Fix invalid constraints for stcond
• Previous by thread: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
• Next by thread: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]