Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>>> You're right here, I don't know why I assumed DEPENDS does it
>>> automatically.
>> Use select.
> 
> It has a known problem - if the "selected" thing changes (requires
> another option etc) things are screwed. With "depends on", you don't
> have to track such changes.
> 
> While near selects (in the same build directory) are IMHO ok, far
> ones are not.
> 
> I think it would be different if trying to select something which
> can't be selected automatically resulted in a warning. I think
> I have to look at it then, but for now I'll use something like
> "depends on (FB_CIRRUS=m && I2C && I2C_ALGOBIT) ||
> (FB_CIRRUS=y && I2C=y && I2C_ALGOBIT=y)".

Well if the i2c code happens to depend on another module, I hope
that Jean would warn us in a timely manner :-). And even if Jean
failed to do so, it would immediately result in a compile
error/warning which should lead to an easy fix.

I still prefer 'select' just because it's easier to parse, but
either way is okay, though your method takes me a few more seconds
to understand.

Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux