* Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let's first get genirq to a point where it's a direct replacement for
> my IRQ subsystem before thinking about changing existing APIs (and
> thereby possibly introducing other breakage.)
note that the API change i suggested was a NOP operation :-) The APIs
were already shaped that way. No need to worry.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
