On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The savings are not only from the code paths. The VM itself is cleaner and
> > the balancing issues are not that troublesome anymore.
>
> Doesn't help - it has to be fixed anyways for NUMA and other architectures.
Some architectures like ours can run with a single zone since they have
DMA that works anywhere. Same thing is true for my machines are home and
at work.
> Also in my experience empty zones are not a significant problem for VM
> balancing.
The problem is that the zones are not even empty! We keep 16M in some
weird ZONE_DMA that barely anyone one uses anymore and add slabs to it
that are only used by some confused device drivers.
Also the empty zones are still a problem since they have to be scanned
repeatedly (potentially on each allocation). They waste cachelines and
result in loops where we could just have straight code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]