On Saturday 08 July 2006 02:42, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > I don't think the savings from this are enough to bother
> > the user with such an obscure config option.
>
> The savings are not only from the code paths. The VM itself is cleaner and
> the balancing issues are not that troublesome anymore.
Doesn't help - it has to be fixed anyways for NUMA and other architectures.
Also in my experience empty zones are not a significant problem for VM
balancing.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
