Re: [RFC 4/8] page allocator: Optional ZONE_DMA

On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I think your idea of saving some cache lines by not having the unused
> zones in the fallback lists etc. is a good one, but your current implementation
> with its ifdef maze is extremly ugly. Surely this can be a done less
> intrusively?

I'd be glad if someone would come up with such an idea.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC 0/8] Optional ZONE_DMA
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [RFC 4/8] page allocator: Optional ZONE_DMA
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 4/8] page allocator: Optional ZONE_DMA
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Ref counting for tty_struct and some locking clean up
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 4/8] page allocator: Optional ZONE_DMA
• Next by thread: [RFC 3/8] eventcounters: Optional ZONE_DMA
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]