Re: [RFC 4/8] page allocator: Optional ZONE_DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 08 July 2006 02:05, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Make ZONE_DMA optional in the page allocator

Hmm, we should rename you the "ifdef warrior"

> - ifdef all code for ZONE_DMA and related definition
> 
> - Without ZONE_DMA, ZONE_HIGHMEM and ZONE_DMA32 we fall back
>   to an empty GFP_ZONEMASK and a ZONES_SHIFT of zero (since there
>   is only one zone....).
> 
> - We need to fix the use of ZONE_DMA in the memory policy layer.
>   ZONE_DMA is used there as the first zone so use 0 instead.


Is the barely better code really worth all the ugliness from the ifdefs? I have doubts.

I think your idea of saving some cache lines by not having the unused
zones in the fallback lists etc. is a good one, but your current implementation
with its ifdef maze is extremly ugly. Surely this can be a done less
intrusively?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux