Hi!
> > This prepares sharpsl_pm.c for collie. Without nested if()s, #ifdefs
> > can be added.
>
> I'm unconvinced as to why collie needs an ifdef in there and looking at
> what I think you're leading to, its ugly. Perhaps you could change the 2
> to a variable set by the machine instead or something, depending upon
> your intention.
Well, I hate the if/else maze -- IMO returns are more readable. Anyway
collie needs both count and time checks disabled, AFAICT.
> Rather than post these patches straight to the patch system, perhaps you
> could also post them for discussion first as discussing them once
> they're submitted seems wrong (and we have to remember to remove the
> patch system from the cc).
Sorry about that. Yep, I'm used to work with akpm...
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
