Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set

On 7/7/06, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:

 - any reason to use the SLAB_* flags instead of GFP_?  I'm a bit surprised
   SLAB_* still exists at all..


I have been wanting to kill the SLAB_* flags for some time now, so
yes, please use the GFP_* ones instead. Thanks.

                                              Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] sharpsl_pm refactor
Next by Date: Re: splice/tee bugs?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]