Re: [-mm patch] drivers/net/e1000/: possible cleanups

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:47:33PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:03:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>...
> >>Changes since 2.6.17-mm5:
> >>...
> >> git-e1000.patch
> >>...
> >> git trees.
> >>...
> >
> >This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
> >- make needlessly global functions static
> 
> I'm fine with those
> 
> >- #if 0 the following unused global functions:
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_mc_addr_list_update()
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_read_reg_io()
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_enable_pciex_master()
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_ife_disable_dynamic_power_down()
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_ife_enable_dynamic_power_down()
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_write_ich8_word()
> >  - e1000_hw.c: e1000_duplex_reversal()
> >  - e1000_main.c: e1000_io_read()
> 
> I'm wondering if we should not remove those alltogether, or are we 
> preferring to keep the #if 0'd now?

#if 0 is the compromise between not bloating the kernel binary with 
unused code and not immediately removing the currently unused code.

If you as a maintainer of this driver say you want a patch to remove 
these unused functions I can also send this patch.

> Cheers,
> 
> Auke
>...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/