On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > Von: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > > > Is it necessary that the futex syscall ignores SA_RESTART? > > > > Very possibly. That was definitely the case for "select()" long ago. > > Why was this necesary back then? I forget the exact details, but certain X applications would stop responding, because they would restart their select() system call in their main select-loop, rather than go through the loop. I _think_ it was SIGALARM installed with SA_RESTART (and doing itimers every 10 ms), but I didn't really care enough - we had select() return ERESTARTSYS for exactly one day back in 199x, and when I figured out what broke, it got reverted pronto. I want to say that the failing app was "oneko" (damn, I should try to find if it still exists - brings back memories of an earlier time), but the point being that it's enough that one app breaks. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- References:
- Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]>
- Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT
- Index(es):