On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >
> > This patch doesn't look right to me. After it is applied, the user will have
> > no way of saying that they don't want to resume (noresume). I assume the
> > removal of resume= isn't a problem because you're expecting them to use that
> > other undocumented way of setting resume= that Pavel mentioned a while ago?
> >
>
> Yes, they have. The handing of resume= and noresume are now done in
> kinit; resume is invoked from userspace by direct command only.
the grumble on kinit is that it is a big monolithic bin.
You have no scriptability and it is not modular.
Very useful pieces out of kinit are not build standalone:
initrd_load, ramdisk_load, do_mounts_md, ..
--
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
