Hi!
> > > > I don't know about AMS, but talking to HDAPS when
> > > > you don't need to does waste enough system resources and power to actually
> > > > justify implementing this.
> >
> > I'd doubt any of the accelerometer implementations would consume much
> > power or CPU.
Actually polling at 100Hz probably _is_ going to be measurable on
modern CPUs -- because it means that CPU has to exit C4. It will not
be too bad, hopefully.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Generic interface for accelerometers (AMS, HDAPS, ...)
- Re: Generic interface for accelerometers (AMS, HDAPS, ...)
- Re: Generic interface for accelerometers (AMS, HDAPS, ...)
- Re: Generic interface for accelerometers (AMS, HDAPS, ...)
- Re: Generic interface for accelerometers (AMS, HDAPS, ...)
- Re: Generic interface for accelerometers (AMS, HDAPS, ...)
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]