On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:49:14 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subject: uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
> From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>
> some wait.h inlines are way too large: init_waitqueue_entry() and
> init_waitqueue_func_entry() generate 20-30 bytes of inlined code
> per call site, and init_waitqueue_head() is 30-40 bytes (on x86).
20-30 bytes for
> -static inline void init_waitqueue_entry(wait_queue_t *q, struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> - q->flags = 0;
> - q->private = p;
> - q->func = default_wake_function;
> -}
seem too much.
This:
--- a/fs/select.c~a
+++ a/fs/select.c
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void __pollwait(struct file *filp
entry->filp = filp;
entry->wait_address = wait_address;
init_waitqueue_entry(&entry->wait, current);
+ init_waitqueue_entry(&entry->wait, current);
add_wait_queue(wait_address,&entry->wait);
}
Increases fs/select.o by only seven bytes.
And this:
diff -puN fs/select.c~a fs/select.c
--- a/fs/select.c~a
+++ a/fs/select.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static void __pollwait(struct file *filp
get_file(filp);
entry->filp = filp;
entry->wait_address = wait_address;
- init_waitqueue_entry(&entry->wait, current);
+ xxinit_waitqueue_entry(&entry->wait, current);
add_wait_queue(wait_address,&entry->wait);
}
_
shrinks fs/select.o by eight bytes. (More than I expected). So it does
appear to be a space win, but a pretty slim one.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
