Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch

On 7/4/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[email protected]> wrote:

@@ -784,6 +786,8 @@ otherwise noted.

   writev: called by the writev(2) system call

+  batch_write: optional, if implemented called by writev(2) and write(2)
+

It'd be nice if you added some explanation here why a filesystem
developer would want to implement it.

                                      Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Reduce MAX_NR_ZONES and remove useless zones.
• Next by Date: Re: Minor cleanup to lockdep.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]