On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 18:56 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 03:13 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> I was reviewing these new ntp adjustment functions, and it seems like it
> would be a lot easier to just switch to a better clocksource. These new
> functions seems to compensate for a clock that has a high rating but is
> actually quite poor..
Not quite. The issue is that the adjustment that the ntpd makes is quite
fine grained, and some clocksources while quite stable, might not be
able to make such a fine adjustment. So the extra error accounting just
allows us to keep track and compensate for the resolution differences.
Does that make sense?
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]