On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 03:13 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> It's a possibility, but the signed/unsigned usage is pretty much
> intentional. The assumptation is that time only goes forward so nothing
> there should become negative, only adjustments happen in both directions.
> It's really weird why it's getting completely so out of control early
> during boot. It would be great if you could also test the patch below, it
> should trigger closer to when it goes wrong and help to analyze the
> problem (or at least rule out a number of possibilities).
I was reviewing these new ntp adjustment functions, and it seems like it
would be a lot easier to just switch to a better clocksource. These new
functions seems to compensate for a clock that has a high rating but is
actually quite poor..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
