On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > >> Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector > >> patches go into Andrew's tree? > > > > long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel > > (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it > > work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad, > > distros and security sensitive people can enable it always). > > > > Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs -fno-stack-protector doesn't even exist afaics; simply because gcc has this as a positive commandline option only.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Index(es):
 |