Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector patches go into Andrew's tree?long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad,distros and security sensitive people can enable it always).
Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs -fstack-protector as appropriate.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Prev by Date: Re: isa_memcpy_fromio
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17: networking bug??
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Index(es):
 |