Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'

Sam Ravnborg wrote:

For klibc you need to patch scripts/Kbuild.klibc

Appending it to KLIBCWARNFLAGS seems the right place.

Do you know from what gcc version we can start using -fno-stack-protector?

Here is a patch for klibc. Miles, could you try it out and see if it does what you need?

	-hpa

diff --git a/scripts/Kbuild.klibc b/scripts/Kbuild.klibc
index ac0439e..d30ada2 100644
--- a/scripts/Kbuild.klibc
+++ b/scripts/Kbuild.klibc
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ include $(srctree)/scripts/Kbuild.includ
 # Defines used when compiling early userspace (klibc programs)
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-KLIBCREQFLAGS     :=
+KLIBCREQFLAGS     := $(call cc_option, -fno-stack-protector, )
 KLIBCARCHREQFLAGS :=
 KLIBCOPTFLAGS     :=
 KLIBCWARNFLAGS    := -W -Wall -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter
diff --git a/usr/klibc/arch/arm/MCONFIG b/usr/klibc/arch/arm/MCONFIG
index 0023eee..fa3ada2 100644
--- a/usr/klibc/arch/arm/MCONFIG
+++ b/usr/klibc/arch/arm/MCONFIG
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ CPU_TUNE := strongarm
 
 KLIBCOPTFLAGS = -Os -march=$(CPU_ARCH) -mtune=$(CPU_TUNE)
 KLIBCBITSIZE  = 32
-KLIBCREQFLAGS = -fno-exceptions
+KLIBCREQFLAGS += -fno-exceptions
 KLIBCSTRIPFLAGS += -R .ARM.exidx
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_KLIBC_THUMB),y)

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
• Next by Date: Re: [KBUILD] allow any PHONY in if_changed_dep
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]