On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 00:25 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 13:31 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:27:27 +0200
> >
> > > I'll cook it up tomorrow.
> >
> > Thanks a lot Thomas. :)
>
> That's what I came up with:
>
> SA_INTERRUPT IRQF_IRQS_DISABLED
> SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
> SA_SHIRQ IRQF_SHARE_IRQ
> SA_PROBEIRQ IRQF_PROBE_IRQ
> SA_TRIGGER_LOW IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW
> SA_TRIGGER_HIGH IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH
> SA_TRIGGER_FALLING IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING
> SA_TRIGGER_RISING IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING
> SA_TRIGGER_MASK IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK
> SA_TIMER IRQF_TIMER
Looks good to me. Do we want to keep a PERCPU flag too ? I don't really
need it anymore on powerpc as I just use the percpu flow handler and I'm
not allowing sharing of IPIs but others might.
Also, I'd like to store the IRQ types in the irq_desc regardless of the
actions that have been registered or not. Any suggestion where to put
that ? The current type values conflict with other desc->status bits at
the moment unless we shift the whole thing up...
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
