On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 13:21 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:47:45 +0100
>
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:00:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > We have the same hassle with SA_INTERRUPT. The question arises, if we
> > > should move the SA_XX flags for interrupts completely out of the signal
> > > SA name space. Rename to IRQ_xxx and put them into interrupt.h.
> >
> > It would probably be sensible, but isn't there rather a lot of
> > drivers to update? We could do it as a transitional thing -
> > #define the old SA_* names to the new in interrupt.h for a while.
>
> This seems like a sane plan.
>
> Someone skilled in sed and awk could probably do the whole
> current tree up in a short amount of time though :-)
>
> I would then only keep the existing defines around for the
> sake of being polite to out-of-tree folks :) Put them in
> the deprecation schedule, then zap them for good a few months
> from now.
I'll cook it up tomorrow.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
