Re: [stable] [PATCH 21/25] kbuild: Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16

* Nix ([email protected]) wrote:
> A difference that makes no difference is no difference :)

No point in digressing from mainline for no good reason ;-)  Either way,
the problem is indeed fixed.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/25] -stable review
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 21/25] kbuild: Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH 21/25] kbuild: Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH 21/25] kbuild: Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16
    • From: Nix <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 28 of 39] IB/ipath - Fixes a bug where our delay for EEPROM no longer works due to compiler reordering
• Next by Date: [PATCH 38 of 39] IB/ipath - More changes to support InfiniPath on PowerPC 970 systems
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH 21/25] kbuild: Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16
• Next by thread: [PATCH 23/25] idr: fix race in idr code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]