-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Sonny Rao <[email protected]>
I ran into a bug where the kernel died in the idr code:
cpu 0x1d: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c000000b7096f710]
pc: c0000000001f8984: .idr_get_new_above_int+0x140/0x330
lr: c0000000001f89b4: .idr_get_new_above_int+0x170/0x330
sp: c000000b7096f990
msr: 800000000000b032
dar: 0
dsisr: 40010000
current = 0xc000000b70d43830
paca = 0xc000000000556900
pid = 2022, comm = hwup
1d:mon> t
[c000000b7096f990] c0000000000d2ad8 .expand_files+0x2e8/0x364 (unreliable)
[c000000b7096faa0] c0000000001f8bf8 .idr_get_new_above+0x18/0x68
[c000000b7096fb20] c00000000002a054 .init_new_context+0x5c/0xf0
[c000000b7096fbc0] c000000000049dc8 .copy_process+0x91c/0x1404
[c000000b7096fcd0] c00000000004a988 .do_fork+0xd8/0x224
[c000000b7096fdc0] c00000000000ebdc .sys_clone+0x5c/0x74
[c000000b7096fe30] c000000000008950 .ppc_clone+0x8/0xc
-- Exception: c00 (System Call) at 000000000fde887c
SP (f8b4e7a0) is in userspace
Turned out to be a race-condition and NULL ptr deref, here's my fix:
Users of the idr code are supposed to call idr_pre_get without locking, so the
idr code must serialize itself with respect to layer allocations. However, it
fails to do so in an error path in idr_get_new_above_int(). I added the
missing locking to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
lib/idr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.17.1.orig/lib/idr.c
+++ linux-2.6.17.1/lib/idr.c
@@ -48,15 +48,21 @@ static struct idr_layer *alloc_layer(str
return(p);
}
+/* only called when idp->lock is held */
+static void __free_layer(struct idr *idp, struct idr_layer *p)
+{
+ p->ary[0] = idp->id_free;
+ idp->id_free = p;
+ idp->id_free_cnt++;
+}
+
static void free_layer(struct idr *idp, struct idr_layer *p)
{
/*
* Depends on the return element being zeroed.
*/
spin_lock(&idp->lock);
- p->ary[0] = idp->id_free;
- idp->id_free = p;
- idp->id_free_cnt++;
+ __free_layer(idp, p);
spin_unlock(&idp->lock);
}
@@ -184,12 +190,14 @@ build_up:
* The allocation failed. If we built part of
* the structure tear it down.
*/
+ spin_lock(&idp->lock);
for (new = p; p && p != idp->top; new = p) {
p = p->ary[0];
new->ary[0] = NULL;
new->bitmap = new->count = 0;
- free_layer(idp, new);
+ __free_layer(idp, new);
}
+ spin_unlock(&idp->lock);
return -1;
}
new->ary[0] = p;
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
