On Wednesday 28 June 2006 00:51, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2006-06-28 00:38:59, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 June 2006 00:22, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I do not think suspend2 works on more machines than in-kernel > > > swsusp. Problems are in drivers, and drivers are shared. > > > > > > That means that if you have machine where suspend2 works and swsusp > > > does not, please tell me. I do not think there are many of them. > > > > Maybe not machines, but definitely usage scenarios. I've tried both > > implementations lately, and swsusp would often -- especially under high > > memory load -- just return from trying, while suspend2 succeeds in > > freeing enough memory to be able to suspend _every_ time. > > Refrigerator fixes should help with this one. Does it still happen in > 2.6.17? Last release I tested was 2.6.17-rc6-git7. > > Is that something uswsusp is likely to change anytime soon? > > Actually this is common code for both swsusp and uswsusp; yes this > should be fixed. In the above mentioned release it definitely is not fixed. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. - Harry S. Truman
Attachment:
pgpnvvnelCvWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- From: Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]>
- Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16.22
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] get USB suspend to work again on 2.6.17-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- Next by thread: Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- Index(es):
 |