On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 12:36 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:35:29PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > I see that no fix made it into 2.6.17.1 or 2.6.16.22.
>
> both came out very quickly and i was waiting on the results from a
> couple of people
>
> > What is the downside of simply reverting the patch that introduced the
> > regression?
>
> it breaks for some other people, it's not clear what the 'right' fix
> here should be, but it might end up being the lesser of two evils
>
> it would be *really* nice if someone from VIA could weigh in here
Any progress on this? I don't see a fix in 2.6.17.2.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
