Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 2006-06-27 19:22:37, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>Some of the advantages of suspend2 over swsusp and uswsusp are:
> >>
> >>- Speed (Asynchronous I/O and readahead for synchronous I/O)
> >
> >uswsusp should be able to match suspend2's speed. It can do async I/O,
> >etc...
> 
> ARGH!
> 
> And the next version of windows will have all the wonderful features that 
> MacOSX has now so best not upgrade to Mac as you can just wait for the next 
> version of windows.
> 
> suspend2 has it *now*. It works, it's stable.

uswsusp also has it *now*, in case you missed it. I just do not do
benchmark runs all the time, and don't know how fast suspend2
is. uswsusp already uses normal I/O ... and that is asynchronous.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux