Re: [patch 2/6] [Network namespace] Network device sharing by view

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Basically it is just a matter of:
> if (dest_mac == my_mac1) it is for device 1.
> If (dest_mac == my_mac2) it is for device 2.
> etc.
>
> At a small count of macs it is trivial to understand it will go
> fast for a larger count of macs it only works with a good data
> structure.  We don't hit any extra cache lines of the packet,
> and the above test can be collapsed with other routing lookup tests.

I think you should do this at the layer-2 level, well before you get
to routing.  That will make the virtual mac-vlan work with arbitrary
protocols and appear very much like a regular ethernet interface.  This
approach worked well with .1q vlans, and with my version of the mac-vlan
module.

Using the mac-vlan and source-based routing tables, I can give a unique
'interface' to each process and have each process able to bind to the
same IP port, for instance.  Using source-based routing (by binding to a local
IP explicitly and adding a route table for that source IP), I can give unique
default routes to each interface as well.  Since we cannot have more than 256
routing tables, this approach is currently limitted to around 250 virtual
interfaces, but that is still a substantial amount.

My mac-vlan patch, redirect-device patch, and other hackings are consolidated
in this patch:

http://www.candelatech.com/oss/candela_2.6.16.patch

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/