Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture

> Just do a compare and swap operation on the instruction you want to replace,
> then do an smp_call_function() with the wait parameter set to 1 and passing
> a pointer to a function that does nothing but return.

Setting wait to 1 isn't necessary as well. Wondering if I get anything right
today...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
    • From: Mike Grundy <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [[email protected]: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture]
    • From: Michael Grundy <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext3_clear_inode(): avoid kfree(NULL)
• Next by Date: Re: PATCH: Change in-kernel afs client filesystem name to 'kafs'
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]