Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture

> Just do a compare and swap operation on the instruction you want to replace,
> then do an smp_call_function() with the wait parameter set to 1 and passing
> a pointer to a function that does nothing but return.

Setting wait to 1 isn't necessary as well. Wondering if I get anything right
today...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
  - From: Mike Grundy <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [[email protected]: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture]
  - From: Michael Grundy <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
  - From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
  - From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext3_clear_inode(): avoid kfree(NULL)
Next by Date: Re: PATCH: Change in-kernel afs client filesystem name to 'kafs'
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]