Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)

On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 23:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ....
> >     eth3      device: S2io Inc. Xframe 10 Gigabit Ethernet PCI-X (rev 03)
> >     eth3      configuration: eth-id-00:0c:fc:00:02:c8
> > irq 60, desc: a0000001009a2d00, depth: 1, count: 0, unhandled: 0
> > ->handle_irq():  0000000000000000, 0x0
> > ->chip(): a000000100a0fe40, irq_type_sn+0x0/0x80
> > ->action(): e00000b007471b80
> > ->action->handler(): a0000002059373d0, s2io_msi_handle+0x1510/0x660 [s2io]    eth3
> > IP address: 192.168.1.248/24
> > Unexpected irq vector 0x3c on CPU 3!
> 
> I guess that's where things start to go bad.  genirq changes?

Hmm, The extra noisy printout is from geirq. The unhandled interrupt
should be unrelated. 

The s2io driver enables interrupts in the card in start_nic() before
requesting the interrupt itself with request_irq(). So I suspect thats a
problem which has been there already, just the noisy printout makes it
more visible

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Jan Blunck <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] vfs: d_genocide() doesnt add dentries to unused list
• Next by Date: [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]