On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:33:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:55:23 +1000
> David Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The boot warnings:
> >
> > ....
> > eth3 device: S2io Inc. Xframe 10 Gigabit Ethernet PCI-X (rev 03)
> > eth3 configuration: eth-id-00:0c:fc:00:02:c8
> > irq 60, desc: a0000001009a2d00, depth: 1, count: 0, unhandled: 0
> > ->handle_irq(): 0000000000000000, 0x0
> > ->chip(): a000000100a0fe40, irq_type_sn+0x0/0x80
> > ->action(): e00000b007471b80
> > ->action->handler(): a0000002059373d0, s2io_msi_handle+0x1510/0x660 [s2io] eth3
> > IP address: 192.168.1.248/24
> > Unexpected irq vector 0x3c on CPU 3!
>
> I guess that's where things start to go bad. genirq changes?
Seems likely. Plain 2.6.17-rc6 doesn't give this error.
> > BUG: warning at drivers/serial/sn_console.c:976/sn_sal_console_write()
>
> There's a warning patch in -mm which shouts when someone does a busywait
> delay of over a millisecond, and sn_sal_console_write() is doing
> mdelay(150).
>
> And it's doing that mdelay because it thinks port->sc_port.lock is already
> held. I don't know why.
Ok, that explains why I haven't seen it before...
> > ip is at kmem_freepages+0x100/0x200
....
>
> slab got messed up - I don't know what did this, either.
2.6.17-rc6 seems fine here as well. I've run with slab debuging
turned on and got the same panic, so it's not something obvious....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
- Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]