Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread

On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Rusty Russell ([email protected]):
> > Seems like change for change's sake, to me, *and* it added more code
> > than it removed.
> 
> So if kernel_thread is really going to be removed, how else should this
> be done?  Just clone?

Sorry, is kernel_thread going to be removed, or just not exported to
modules?  What's kthread going to use?

Confused,
Rusty.
-- 
Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix cdrom open
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]