Quoting Rusty Russell ([email protected]):
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Rusty Russell ([email protected]):
> > > Seems like change for change's sake, to me, *and* it added more code
> > > than it removed.
> >
> > So if kernel_thread is really going to be removed, how else should this
> > be done? Just clone?
>
> Sorry, is kernel_thread going to be removed, or just not exported to
> modules? What's kthread going to use?
>
> Confused,
> Rusty.
Hah.
Yes, I see. I misread. So I should be focusing on modules :)
Really, all *I* care about is cases where the resulting pid is cached
as a pointer to the thread, which it wasn't here anyway.
thanks, sorry for the noise.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
