Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:46:55PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > bfset and friends need "o", not "m" - they don't work with autodecrement
> > memory arguments.  bitops.h had it fixed, signal.h hadn't...
> 
> I have a better version for this one pending, which I have queued for 
> 2.6.18.

Could you post it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] affs_fill_super() %s abuses
• Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3] posix cpu timers fixes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]