Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h

Hi,

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote:

> bfset and friends need "o", not "m" - they don't work with autodecrement
> memory arguments.  bitops.h had it fixed, signal.h hadn't...

I have a better version for this one pending, which I have queued for 
2.6.18.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add MCP65 support for amd74xx, sata_nv, and ahci drivers (and device ids in pci_ids)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/16] 64bit Resource: finally enable 64bit resource sizes
Previous by thread: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]