Mark Lord wrote:
Further to this, the current behaviour is badly unpredictable.
A machine could be working perfectly, not (noticeably) affected
by this bug. And then the user adds another stick of RAM to it.
This "bug" already existed in 2.6.16 to a certain extent: you were
losing out on a lot of TCP performance. Go back to 2.6.7, measure TCP
performance, and you'll probably find it was significantly better.
Also, there aren't that many broken end-points out there.
www.everymac.com loads fine for me and does not ignore the window scale
factor.
The problem in your case is a broken router in the middle. I had the
same problem: certain sites would not load, but there is absolutely
nothing wrong with the servers that run these sites:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=114478312100641&w=2
I contacted my ISP and informed them of the issue. They fixed it
nationwide within a few weeks. You might try confirming that your
problem only applies to HTTP like mine did (ISP runs some lame
transparent webcaches), and it was a bug in the software there (NetApp).
We already had the "some routers are broken, should we do anything"
discussion back at the time of 2.6.8:
http://lwn.net/Articles/92727/
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
