Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes: > But it's not just about the amount of false negatives, but also about > the overhead of scanning. You are concentrated on embedded systems with > small RAM - but most of the testers will be running this with at last > 1GB of RAM - which is _alot_ of memory to scan. Most of this should be normally in page cache which doesn't need to be scanned? There might be some extreme loads with a lot more kernel data, but they are probably rare. -Andi 7 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: "Catalin Marinas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: "Catalin Marinas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: "Catalin Marinas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- Prev by Date: Re: zoned vm counters: per zone counter functionality
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Use ZVCs for numa statistics.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
- Index(es):
 |