On 12/06/06, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
What i'd like to see though are clear explanations about why an
allocation is not considered a leak, in terms of comments added to the
code. That will also help us reduce the number of annotations later on.
I'll document them in both Documentation/kmemleak.txt and inside the
code. If I implement the "any pointer inside the block" method, all
the memleak_padding() false positives will disappear.
--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
