Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

>+extern int kernel_ioctl(struct socket *sock, int cmd, unsigned long arg);
>+

I would prefer naming it kernel_sock_ioctl, since (general) ioctl often 
done on fds (or struct file * for that matter) rather than sockets.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [UML] Problems building and running 2.6.17-rc4 on x86-64
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [2.6.17-rc6] Section mismatch in drivers/net/ne.o during modpost
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]