Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:48 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> 
> Did we settle the question of whether these particular exports should be
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?

When i submitted this patch, i didn't really think about the different
ways to export these symbols. I simply used the EXPORT_SYMBOL() that is 
used by all the other exports in net/socket.c including kernel_sendmsg()
and kernel_recvmsg().

I am OK with either option(EXPORT_SYMBOL or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL) and i will
leave it to David Miller to make that decision at this point.

Thanks
Sridhar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    • From: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    • From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    • From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    • From: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    • From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Serial-Core: USB-Serial port current issues.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] NI5010 netcard cleanup (was: Re: NI5010 network driver -- MAINTAINERS entry)
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]