Re: broken local_t on i386

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Possible, but is it worth reinventing the linker?

How would that work?

IMHO The linker cannot help with virtual to physical address translations. 
A linker that will link per processor would be amazing. What happens if 
the process is rescheduled? We dynamically relink to the new processor?

I thought you had some funky segment registers on i386 and x86_64. Cant 
they be switched on context switch? If an inc/dec could work relative to 
those then you would not need a virtual mapping.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux