Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it

> It is just the price of those walks that makes smaps not an attractive
> solution for monitoring purposes.

It just shouldn't be used for that. It's a debugging hack and not really 
suitable for monitoring even with optimizations.

For monitoring if the current numa statistics are not good enough
you should probably propose new counters.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
  - From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
  - From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
  - From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: broken local_t on i386
Next by Date: Re: broken local_t on i386
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]