Re: broken local_t on i386

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Also on non preemptive kernels - which are the majority - it's a single
> instruction on x86. I guess preempt users can live with a bit more
> overhead ... 

I hope you will be fixing the cpu_local_* macros for i386 and x86_64 and 
add some appropriate docs? Are there any existing uses in the kernel?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux