On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:57:22PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday June 12, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:32:39AM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > > SPF is application level version of this type of source sanity
> > > enforcement, and all that I intend to do is to publish that TXT
> > > entry for VGER. Analyzing SPF data in incoming SMTP reception
> > > is a thing that I leave for latter phase (how much latter,
> > > I can't say yet.)
> >
> > In which case I have no option but to ask - Zwane, please stop using
> > my systems to forward your lkml email - Matti's proposed change will
> > potentially break that setup.
>
> Of course you do have other options.
Since you haven't read my original reply to Matti, your comments aren't
appropriate for me since you don't know the full story.
However, I will point out that I'm at liberty to choose any option I
deem to be appropriate, for whatever reasons I feel appropriate. In
this situation, I feel that withdrawing from providing mail forwarding
facilities is most appropriate.
I've been thinking about withdrawing that for some time for other
reasons - the SPF argument has provided another, and the final reason
to make it happen.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
