Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error

Wu Fengguang wrote:
[]
> Andrew:
> I was a bit afraid about that because I have no CDROM to try it out.
> But since Michael has tested it OK, it should be OK for the stable kernel.

Hmm.. I haven't "tested it OK" yet. I just ran a quick-n-dirty
check.  Tomorrow I'll be in our office where I have more adequate
"test environment" for this stuff (different CD/DVD drives and
disks, some scratched), and I'll do some real testing.

Thanks.

/mjt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
  - From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
  - From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
  - From: Ingo Oeser <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
  - From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
  - From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Good performance (hard realtime ??) on 2.6.16 patched with patch-2.6.16-rt29 from Ingo Molnar
Next by Date: x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/5] readahead: backoff on I/O error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]