Hi Fengguang,
On Friday, 9. June 2006 10:08, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Backoff readahead size exponentially on I/O error.
> With this patch, retries are expected to be reduced from, say, 256, to 5.
1. Would you mind to push this patch to -stable?
Reason: If killing a drive was hit in the field, this should be critical
enough.
2. Could you disable (at least optionally) read ahead complety
on the first IO error?
Reason: In a data recovery situation (hitting EIO quite often,
but not really sequentially) readahead is counter productive.
E.g. trying to save an old CD with the cdparanoia software.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]